Comment on BQ by Lenore Evans 27/11/06
I am one of the 10% outside of the SEQ.
One of the 500 cyclists who are working for and supporting BQ etc
for 80% of the land mass of Queensland and possibly 80% of the
state's wealth generators. The work that we do in regional areas to
promote cycling so that facilities are provided etc, is just as
important as the work that BQ does for SEQ. Don't tell me that our
advocacy and successes haven't also had a flow on effect that helps
BQ to achieve great things for SEQ. Our political voting system was
changed to reflect one person one vote in each electorate. Just
look at how large our electorates are up here. How can one
representative manage to work for such large areas. A similar
situation applies to cyclists and the different percentage of BQ
membership throughout the state. Anyhow if BQ wants to continue to
call itself BQueensland, it must acknowlege those 500 members
outside the SEQ and especially those members who are doing as much
work for cycling in their own back yard as any one in the SEQ. 500
members @ $70 is $35,000 less the cost of the Australian Cyclist
Magazine = say $20,000 @$40 each. I didn't realise we were worth
that much. How much would each member cost in insurance cover. And
what is left over for represntation etc. And we could go on and
on. In the meantime, our regional workers are all voluntary, a lot
of cost is borne by individuala and our effectiveness and
commitment is 100%. What would Queensland do without us. Once upon
a time, cities were the administrative and support centres for the
country that generated the state's wealth that benefited everyone.
People in cities eat the food grown in regional Queensland, meat,
bread, milk, fruit, vegetables, sugar etc. Food is not produced in
the city sufficient to sustain large populations. Water and power
is generated outside the city. And don't forget our mineral wealth
that benefits all Australians. So don't country people deserve to
be supported? If it wasn't for people living and working in
regional Queensland, cities would not survive. Cities now have
their own agendas behind a smokecreen of population numbers to
warrant that country people are a minority and don't matter any
more. Let's hope that BQ does not fit this mould. Let's hope that
BQ will acknowledge that working for cyclists all across Queensland
will be to everyone's benefit, the city and the country. Divide and
conquer is not a new concept and we certainly don't want the
government to think that all is not well with BQ. We need to have a
united front if we want to promote cycling as a necessary transport
mode that will help to solve so many modern day issues not only in
Queensland but world wide. A good place to start is the support of
BUGs throughout Queensland with BQ involvement and representation to
meetings, government departments, transport providers and
appropriate cycling services personnel in Brisbane because distance
is the barrier that isolates us.
Lenore.
|
| New BQ Rules - A view by Lenore Evans of Cairns BUG Nov/06
Hi People,
Re: New BQ rules
Well - we certainly have some issues here that provide food for thought.
No doubt we are all very proud of what cyclists in Brisbane and
throughout Queensland have accomplished - and BQ is only too well aware
of that. I am a member of BQ and CBUG executive so that we enjoy free
insurance when conducting bug business and bike week activities. We also
get the funds we ask for, for Bike Week. Sometimes we ask for technical
advice etc. BQ Meetings and workshops are not available to regional bugs
because of distance. The BFA bikeability toolkit is fairly easy to
understand so I'm not too fazed about not going to the bugs workshop.
A couple of comments.
1. The new objectives have omitted the word "Queensland". There is no
reference to Queensland in the objectives. I did a word search - the
word Queensland is used in the new rules four times - p3, name of
association, Bicycle Queensland - p8, where secretary must reside, in
Queensland or within 65km from the border of Queensland - p17, financial
records must be kept in Queensland.
2. So it is to be assumed that membership is not restricted. Anyone in
Queensland, Australia, or even anywhere in the world, could join BQ, if
they are accepted of course.
3. There is not one mention of BUGs.
4. There is not one mention of the Bicycle Federation of Australia.
5. So in effect BQ is a stand alone organisation with no legal
affiliation with bugs unless there is something in the constitution.
6. I don't know what the affiliation with the BFA is and this is
probably in the constitution also.
7. Just because you are a member of a bug, doesn't make you a member of
BQ.
8. There is no mention of regional representation on the management
committee.
9. There is no mention of any geographical area that BQ would work for.
9. Another benchmark would be to compare the rules with the
constitution.
It seems that BQ wants members all over Queensland but the rules
indicate a reluctance to clarify involvement in the issues and affairs
of the area of Queensland. So it is up to each and every bug just to
push along our own agendas and do what we can where necessary.
For instance, Main Roads Policy for cycling is a Queensland issue and
generally, bugs can deal with this at a local level. However, the
interpretation of policies can be misleading and some practical advice
when necessary, would go a long way. Just referring bugs to the Main
Roads Policy for Cycling is not sufficient. More backup and
understanding is needed so I have tried to help another bug with
information about Cairns successes, making suggestions how to work with
MR. I have also made a submission to the Australian Standards for open
level railway crossings. These are just small examples of the enormous
amount of work that is accomplished by bugs throughout Queensland. with
minimal help from our parent organisation.
However, a little recognition in the Rules of Association that bugs
throughout Queensland are contributing to the overall awareness of the
benefits of cycling right across Queensland, would add another dimension
to cycling advocacy. Queenslanders often feel isolated and non-inclusive
in all areas of life. Cycling advocacy is no exception. Is BQ the
spokesperson for cyclists all over Queensland whether it is BQ meetings
or the State Cycle Committee or workshops or consultation with
government departments? Does this mean getting involved with cycling
issues all over Queensland, providing communication and feedback between
bugs and the management committee and BQ representatives? Should this be
a new objective? - not just open ended objectives that could be loosely
interpreted.
To start with, we expect that all BQ representation on committees, at
meetings, government consultations, submissions etc is "Queensland"
orientated. Particularly, issues around funding opportunities would
require the need for all Queenslanders to have appropriate funding,
plans, strategies and implementation. Brisbane is closer to the pot of
gold so it is easier to have direct representation.
The name "Bicycle Queensland" infers that the organisation represents
and works for members who are cyclists and who live anywhere in
Queensland. Any deviation from this is not a true reflection of the name
of the organisation.
Being a member of BQ means that we all work for the good of all cyclists
no matter where they live in Queensland.
I don't believe that the new set of rules will make membership of BQ any
better or worse. I abstain from voting.
My comments are not necessarily the views of all CBUG members.
To view BQ Rules www.bq.org.au
Lenore Evans Secretary Cairns Bicycle User Group
4054 1756
17 Gordon St, Earlville, Cairns 4870 www.cairnsbug.org
|