Comment on BQ by Lenore Evans 27/11/06

I am one of the 10% outside of the SEQ.  One of the 500 cyclists who are working for and supporting BQ etc for 80% of the land mass of Queensland and possibly 80% of the state's wealth generators.  The work that we do in regional areas to promote cycling so that facilities are provided etc, is just as important as the work that BQ does for SEQ.  Don't tell me that our advocacy and successes haven't also had a flow on effect that helps BQ to achieve great things for SEQ.  Our political voting system was changed to reflect one person one vote in each electorate.  Just look at how large our electorates are up here.  How can one representative manage to work for such large areas.  A similar situation applies to cyclists and the different percentage of BQ membership throughout the state.  Anyhow if BQ wants to continue to call itself BQueensland, it must acknowlege those 500 members outside the SEQ and especially those members who are doing as much work for cycling in their own back yard as any one in the SEQ.  500 members @ $70 is $35,000 less the cost of the Australian Cyclist Magazine = say $20,000 @$40 each.  I didn't realise we were worth that much.  How much would each member cost in insurance cover.  And what is left over for represntation etc.  And we could go on and on.  In the meantime, our regional workers are all voluntary, a lot of cost is borne by individuala and our effectiveness and commitment is 100%.  What would Queensland do without us. Once upon a time, cities were the administrative and support centres for the country that generated the state's wealth that benefited everyone.  People in cities eat the food grown in regional Queensland, meat, bread, milk, fruit, vegetables, sugar etc.  Food is not produced in the city sufficient to sustain large populations.  Water and power is generated outside the city. And don't forget our mineral wealth that benefits all Australians.  So don't country people deserve to be supported?  If it wasn't for people living and working in regional Queensland, cities would not survive.  Cities now have their own agendas behind a smokecreen of population numbers to warrant that country people are a minority and don't matter any more.  Let's hope that BQ does not fit this mould. Let's hope that BQ will acknowledge that working for cyclists all across Queensland will be to everyone's benefit, the city and the country.  Divide and conquer is not a new concept and we certainly don't want the government to think that all is not well with BQ.  We need to have a united front if we want to promote cycling as a necessary transport mode that will help to solve so many modern day issues not only in Queensland but world wide.  A good place to start is the support of BUGs throughout Queensland with BQ involvement and representation to meetings, government departments, transport providers and appropriate cycling services personnel in Brisbane because distance is the barrier that isolates us. 

 
Lenore.

 

New BQ Rules - A view by Lenore Evans of Cairns BUG Nov/06

 

Hi People,

Re: New BQ rules

Well - we certainly have some issues here that provide food for thought. No doubt we are all very proud of what cyclists in Brisbane and throughout Queensland have accomplished - and BQ is only too well aware of that. I am a member of BQ and CBUG executive so that we enjoy free insurance when conducting bug business and bike week activities. We also get the funds we ask for, for Bike Week. Sometimes we ask for technical advice etc. BQ Meetings and workshops are not available to regional bugs because of distance. The BFA bikeability toolkit is fairly easy to understand so I'm not too fazed about not going to the bugs workshop.

A couple of comments.
1. The new objectives have omitted the word "Queensland". There is no reference to Queensland in the objectives. I did a word search - the word Queensland is used in the new rules four times - p3, name of association, Bicycle Queensland - p8, where secretary must reside, in Queensland or within 65km from the border of Queensland - p17, financial records must be kept in Queensland.
2. So it is to be assumed that membership is not restricted. Anyone in Queensland, Australia, or even anywhere in the world, could join BQ, if they are accepted of course.
3. There is not one mention of BUGs.
4. There is not one mention of the Bicycle Federation of Australia.
5. So in effect BQ is a stand alone organisation with no legal affiliation with bugs unless there is something in the constitution.
6. I don't know what the affiliation with the BFA is and this is probably in the constitution also.
7. Just because you are a member of a bug, doesn't make you a member of BQ.
8. There is no mention of regional representation on the management committee.
9. There is no mention of any geographical area that BQ would work for.
9. Another benchmark would be to compare the rules with the constitution.

It seems that BQ wants members all over Queensland but the rules indicate a reluctance to clarify involvement in the issues and affairs of the area of Queensland. So it is up to each and every bug just to push along our own agendas and do what we can where necessary.

For instance, Main Roads Policy for cycling is a Queensland issue and generally, bugs can deal with this at a local level. However, the interpretation of policies can be misleading and some practical advice when necessary, would go a long way. Just referring bugs to the Main Roads Policy for Cycling is not sufficient. More backup and understanding is needed so I have tried to help another bug with information about Cairns successes, making suggestions how to work with MR. I have also made a submission to the Australian Standards for open level railway crossings. These are just small examples of the enormous amount of work that is accomplished by bugs throughout Queensland. with minimal help from our parent organisation.

However, a little recognition in the Rules of Association that bugs throughout Queensland are contributing to the overall awareness of the benefits of cycling right across Queensland, would add another dimension to cycling advocacy. Queenslanders often feel isolated and non-inclusive in all areas of life. Cycling advocacy is no exception. Is BQ the spokesperson for cyclists all over Queensland whether it is BQ meetings or the State Cycle Committee or workshops or consultation with government departments? Does this mean getting involved with cycling issues all over Queensland, providing communication and feedback between bugs and the management committee and BQ representatives? Should this be a new objective? - not just open ended objectives that could be loosely interpreted.

To start with, we expect that all BQ representation on committees, at meetings, government consultations, submissions etc is "Queensland" orientated. Particularly, issues around funding opportunities would require the need for all Queenslanders to have appropriate funding, plans, strategies and implementation. Brisbane is closer to the pot of gold so it is easier to have direct representation.

The name "Bicycle Queensland" infers that the organisation represents and works for members who are cyclists and who live anywhere in Queensland. Any deviation from this is not a true reflection of the name of the organisation.

Being a member of BQ means that we all work for the good of all cyclists no matter where they live in Queensland.

I don't believe that the new set of rules will make membership of BQ any better or worse. I abstain from voting.

My comments are not necessarily the views of all CBUG members.

To view BQ Rules www.bq.org.au

Lenore Evans Secretary Cairns Bicycle User Group
4054 1756
17 Gordon St, Earlville, Cairns 4870 www.cairnsbug.org